And the Sun became subdued And the fire burned out in the distance And the Sun became blood red And darkness fell upon the Earth
A reflection on future forces at work
The universe is full of magical things,
Patiently waiting for our wits to grow sharper.
Eden Philotts
Some people are known to have changed the course of science, along with our outlook on the universe and our place in it, by a single act of insight or revelation. Such a discovery could come in a dream (Dmitri Mendeleev) or arise from the searching mind of a recluse (Konstantin Tsiolkovsky)...
Without any explicit assertion of parallels, the author offers his insight for your consideration:
"After my extensive research about the origin of matter in the universe, I
arrived at the following conclusion: If we consider Einstein's equation (2)
E = mc2, where energy is represented by E and then calculate the mass (m)
as being equal to E/c2, that brings the value of the mass to
E/88 739 643 664. This means that by reducing the amount of energy and
shrinking it to the value of the denominator, we can get the energy to materialize. Such a compression should be a regular matter in the universe.
With this in mind, I proceed to the subject of my primary investigation - the fundamental concept of time, notably, the most controversial in the science of the Cosmos. Some new mathematical calculations that I have introduced into the basic equations of quantum mechanics may contribute to our understanding of the concept of time and possibly destroy the generally accepted numerological notion of it.
Since their early beginnings, as far back as in the VIII century B.C., that is long before the Bible was written, ancient people were conscious of time and its irregular nature.
The goddess of magic, Circe, in Homer's Odyssey (3) was able to accelerate and slow down time on about four hundred occasions. That could explain Odysseus' unusually long stay as her house guest. At a later time, Heraclitus of Ephesus (530-470 B.C.) pointed out that "We both step and do not step into the same rivers. We are and we are not." This may be a reference to the flow of time, as perceived by the ancients, notably a flow in one direction. By using the term "flow" they indicated that they considered time as an unbroken course.
The fact that this understanding has not changed throughout the centuries may serve as evidence of its correctness. At least, according to Zhanna Aguzarova (a Russian singer and, clearly, an unbiased party) "Clocks go only forward..."
After being through a number of sources and Biblical texts, I discovered many references to time, which amazingly foreshadowed the modern concept of time (see my Comparative Scriptology.)
The first postulate; time did not always exist. (Until there is time..."
(Gal. 6:10). This means that time has a beginning (the Creation of the World) and an end. Assuming that is the case, how should we understand "eternity"? Most likely, as a continuous process... (1 Thess. 5:17). Does that
make sense, or do we have a contradiction here? I don't believe so. Time and eternity are two orders of existence, two ways of exploring the world, occasionally transitional, but never concurrent. We live in time and can imagine eternity as an imperceptible mode of existence. That is, it is beyond human perception To quote: "Omnia tempos habent et suis spatiis transeunt" (Eccl. 3:1). (4) Let us explain this in more detail:
Concepts, theories and ideas concerning time have circulated for a long time in conformal cyclic cosmic science. For example, Penrose-Gurdzyan's theory describes such cycles. According to him, recapitulation and capitulation of the universe (see my previous association) is going on in endless cycles of energy-mass-energy, etc. Important evidence supporting that could be an event of two black holes merging. A critical mass forms in the process of the particles' interaction, whereas Maximon is a homogeneous substance with gravitational power and time approaching к ;. Any distortion of symmetry leads to the Big Bang and birth of the observable universe. With the proviso that the symmetry was not destroyed, the new universe cannot be formed. Therefore Maximon is bound to exist eternally.
However, there is an important question here: "What if our universe was born first?" Let us suppose that for some reason, the symmetry of Maximon was destroyed and the present universe was formed, in which tangential development turned into a function of radial and led to the origin of humankind. I could imagine such a possibility...
From the point of view of the observer outside Maximon, life in the universe has evolved for billions of years, but this is a finite process. On the other hand for an observer inside Maximon, this process lasts for eternity as the speed of time approaches infinity and simultaneously equals zero. This paradox I defined as the Ivanov-Koiokoitsov Paradox. I would like to emphasize yet again that inside Maximon the entropy equals absolute zero. There is no time or matter outside the universe. Every Big Bang alters the geometry of the world and brings it closer to Euclide's geometry, while turning it into an 11-dimension one. Matter spreads around unevenly. But there still remain permanent constants, including the size of every new
universe. I believe that in every cycle, only one Maximon is active and its mass remains constant. My calculations showed that with the mass of Maximon of 1.76 x 10*82 degree kg. It is close to the size of our Sun, making it perhaps slightly less than ± Nx The physicist Joan Vaccaro (5) discovered that the second element of thermodynamics remains constant and irreversible. That is, without breaking the T-invariance (temporary symmetry) strange things can happen, such as objects may travel in time as easily as in space. Having appeared in one part of the universe, they can instantly vanish. Comparative methods do not apply here. It means that the Second Law of Thermodynamics doesn't allow the change of the vector of time flow. That is why I dismiss the idea of travel into the past as totally unrealistic.
The second postulate: As related to my formula: "Time is material and matter exists only in time." In this interrelated formula, time precedes matter, while matter follows time. How is this possible? During the first microsecond after the Big Bang tempions (my term), elements of time or the smallest structural cosmic elements spread out to the boundaries of the visible Universe ± xn km. (tempius - time in latin) What would be the speed of tempions? According to my calculations, during the first microsecond after the Big Bang, the speed of tempions in all directions comes to 1.89 x 10*36 km/sec. - that is, many times greater than the speed of light. Scientific studies suggest that any movement exceeding the speed of light in a vacuum contradicts the principle of causality. But my physical theory infers that such a process occurs not in a classical vacuum and not in space, but at some place without any interaction. Effectively, the travel time of time particles from the given point to the boundaries of the universe slightly exceeds the Planck time lp/c=; hG/c5=5.39 x l0*-44 sec. How is this speed achieved? Tempions' momentum at the moment of the Big Bang doesn't belong to any field. It is free. As I have stated above, there is no time or space outside Maximon. Therefore at this point in time Lorentz forces do not apply. They emerge after release of the electromagnetic forces of interaction equaling Fl = Fc+ Fm, where Fm is the magnetic component. The summarized Lorenz force is analogous to the Coriolis force in
hydrodynamics. This is consistent with my theory and that of Mir Faizal (6) about the circulation of matter. Following the process of materialization, as the universe gradually cools down, the speed of tempions slows down and becomes less that the speed of light. Hopefully, this conclusion may encourage a new program of research into these particles. But I see no point in looking for elementary particles that travel at a greater speed than the speed of light in the material world. Their very existence will not radically change the picture of Creation and has rather an applied value to such phenomena as the Big Bang, the existence of Black Holes and the assumption that our universe is a single act of creation. Black holes cannot be seen as "portals" to other universes for the mere reason that these portals do not exist. He who manipulates our world dwells outside it and is immortal. Besides, modern technologies, which nowadays provide access to the most distant parts, could have given evidence by now of some interaction, diffusion and change of the boundary layer of our universe or some other universe. But that is not happening. And that is just as well, because it would be disastrous for us. Our observable universe is currently stationary and in repose. The boundaries of our universe are comfortably static. So there is no cause for alarm at the moment. This assertion applies for the semi-spherical configuration of the universe, but not for a flat universe. Tempions are more related to the matter than van der Waals forces, or forces of strong atomic interactions carrying gluons. Tempions serve as a voluminous canvas which carries elementary particles including quarks, leptons and other carriers of interactions, such as bosons, gluons, photons, gravitons, etc. In fact, tempions represent the dark energy of Cosmos, which has failed to materialize, in other words, leftovers of Maximon.
At the boundaries of the universe under the influence of moving matter, Coreolis forces emerge. After solving the equation determining the Coreolis force in partial derivatives this gives a value of FK = 2m [v,w], which shows that Coreolis force is in direct ratio to the mass. It means that at the boundaries of the universe, mass compresses into some kind of a cocoon during which time the concentration of tempions for a unit of volume
increases, forming fieids, which I named Tempionic Fields of Ivanov- Kolokoltsov. In them the speed of time is increasingly greater, which makes travel beyond our universe virtually impossible. However if, contrary to my opinion, another universe still exists and it moves towards ours, then the Ivanov-Kolokoltsov field wiil prevent the penetration of alien matter into our space, throwing it out by means of gravitational time forces.
The third postulate; As was stated above, tempions, that is, time and, consequently, matter spread in the universe unevenly. One can see that with telescopes. Time particles have dual qualities. First of ali, they are particies that have a neutral charge, absence of mass and are devoid of interaction, apart from gravitational forces; they rather resemble a soap bubble, which wili never burst. In other words time is material, but is it discrete? That is a good question. Having covered the way from Maximon to the boundaries of the universe, time particles leave a trail shaped like a vibrating string down which matter moves further into space in all directions with the frequency, according to my calculations, F = tp/lp = 1,62 x 10*9. This inference applies only to the first stage of the birth of the universe. As it grows older, the vibration diminishes. Currently, the oscillation amplitude of the strings is 65-70% of the initial amplitude. Ultimately, when the vibration stops, it would bring about the end of the World. The quantum theory of the strings was developed in the early 1970s as a sequel to the Gabriele Veneziano formula (7). This theory is based on the hypotheses describing string compositionai modeis of hadrons and pions (J. Scherk, Schwarz 1974). What about the size of time particles? It is known that fundamentai interactions appear as a result of fluctuation and interaction of the ultramicroscopic quantum strings of lengths up to the Plank length lp= H/mp x C hereby lp = ; hG/c3= 1,61 x 10*35 M. of the primary and secondary quantization. One important thing about it is that a string has no matter, but is pure energy forming space. The actual material universe, formed after the emergence of space-time.
We beiieve that there may be two possibilities of the spread of matter:
No 1: when we look at the pendulum of a clock in its left position, we are aware of its presence. When it swings to its right position, as we are still looking to the left, we cannot see the pendulum and imagine that it has temporarily disappeared. However, this is not a physical state, but an illusion, because nothing actually happened to the pendulum. The same thing happens to matter. It neither appears from nowhere, nor disappears to nowhere. Its fluctuation has a very small amplitude and poses no danger to the integrity of an object due to interaction forces. This creates an illusion of staticity.
No 2: (a little more dynamic). That is when the pendulum is seen only in its utmost positions and seems to disappear in the "zero" position. In this case the movement of mass particles may become chaotic. It is difficult to predict in which place the mass will emerge again. As far as I know, nobody has yet cancelled the principle of corpuscular wave-particle duality (W. Heisenberg 1927) (8).
The formal approach to the primary quantization movement of the trial string in the external string fields is described with mathematical methods; yet the possibility of interaction between the strings as well as their disintegration and merging, is not abandoned altogether. An approach to the primary quantization unites string theory and my modification of this theory with general field theory in the World.
We live in times when time and gravitation have already reached their limit; however, other known forces of interaction, such as electromagnetic quantum chromo dynamics and weak isospin are still out there because their velocity is considerably less than that of tempions after the Big Bang.
Apparently, it is theoretically possible to develop a theory that will embrace "EVERYTHING" and there has been some progress towards this target. One such attempt is string theory that could unite gravitational forces with electromagnetic forces of interaction.
In my view, the possibility of developing a theory of EVERYTHING is tangible only in the case that we know all the forces of interaction. Nobody can tell what awaits us down this road. What new forces of interaction will arrive to
US from the depths of the universe, or result from our tests with supersonic sound energies, remains unknown. But one thing is certain - mankind will not survive in the universe where these forces have already dispersed. Not to mention the fact that every civilization ultimately perishes at some stage.
As I have mentioned previously, in the beginning the universe comprised the length, radius of curvature, angular sum of ranges as Euclid understood it. When viewed as such, it has boundaries and its final frontier can be reached. The universe has no topology. It is a static, finite space that can be represented as an equivalent of a three dimension surface of a sphere. As it evolved, with the contours of its boundaries changing all the time, the universe transformed from a three dimension into an eleven dimension one.
Denotation of the falsehood of multiple universes lands us in the realm of hyper reality. Theoretically, on paper, it is possible to construct such a multiple universe. As for our native universe, it is destined to the status of self sufficient reality, which possesses a mass of 1,76 x 10*82 degree kg., the age of 13.83 milliard years and density of 9 x 10*-30 degree gr./cm.
In conclusion, I might even reap what I have sown...
P.S. Fortunately, fundamental constants are currently stable. Well, for now...