Chapter 18. Supporters

According to the reaction of Russian scientists to Vasily's theory, a complete refusal to perceive it, one can get the impression that the domestic science is in complete collapse, the deepest depressive pit. Nobody wants to know about anything. Because of hopeless mental and spiritual laziness, many scientists, especially those engaged in theoretical and gravitational research, are mired in the swamp of the general theory of relativity, the theory of the inflationary universe/ They look at space through the "glasses of dark matter", wander among the abstractions of string theories, superstrings. They like zombies who do not know how to think independently.
But it turned out that the picture was not so bleak. People have appeared and continue to appear in our life, who are very sympathetic to Vasyly's discoveries, understand their significance. They become supporters of his ideas, actively refer to them in their scientific works. One of them is Vladimir Kuznetsov, the chief researcher of the Institute of Cosmophysical Research and Propagation of Radio Waves, of whom I have already written.
Another scientist is Doctor of Philosophy Yuri Markov. He graduated from Moscow State University, defended his thesis on the specialty "astrophysics", but became a philosopher.
In 2005 he wrote an e-mail to Vasily, in which he told that he had got acquainted with his discoveries by reading my book "Beyond the Stars. What is outside the Universe edge? " He had seen it accidentally in the store "Science". Then he read Vasily's monographs. One of the scientific directions that Markov develops is connected with the ecological concept of the world. According to this concept, the Universe is a huge "house" in which everything is interconnected. Vasily's idea that all the matter of our Universe creates fundamental constants, fits into the understanding of the "ecology of the Universe". Yuri Gennadievich said that he agrees with many Vasily’s ideas, and he believed that Vasily had opened new pages in physics. Later, he repeatedly referred to Vasily’s discoveries in his books.
Yuri Gennadievich wrote to Vasily quite regularly, congratulated him on the New Year and other holidays. In the summer of 2013 he planned to come to Moscow with his wife for a meeting of graduates of Moscow State University. He wanted to meet with us. This letter we received, already living in Hurghada. Vasily replied that we had moved to Egypt. Yuri Gennadyevich was upset about such an event, but he reacted with understanding.
Another scientist, who highly appreciated Vasily's discoveries, is the chief researcher of the St. Petersburg Institute of Informatics and Automation of the Russian Academy of Sciences Revold Ivanovich Polonnikov. In his book "Basic Concepts of General Information Theory" he wrote about Vasily’s theory on of 15 pages. What for? He answered this question himself: "The quantum theory of gravitation of Vasily Leonidovich Yanchilin is very young, nevertheless, its results are so fundamental and set forth so simply and clearly that it was difficult to resist the temptation to repeat his main ideas in this book." By the way, the book is published in the publishing house "Science" in St. Petersburg. Vasily learned about it by accident. He was looking for books on quantum information and came across it. Later Vasily’s sister Helen, who lives in St. Petersburg, bought a book by Polonnikov in the “House of Books” on the Nevsky Prospekt street.
Talking with the owner of the publishing house “URRS”, Vasily mentioned Polonnikov's book. Domingo became interested in it, wanted to republish it. But it turned out that Polonnikova was no longer alive. We regret that we did not meet Revold Ivanovich personally. When he wrote a book with the chapter on Vasin's theory, he was almost eighty years old! This is surprising, because before that we believed that Vasily's ideas would be accepted only by young people. But as it turned out later, for some reason it is the young people who often show inertia of thinking and constantly "look back" in their judgments on their scientific leaders.


Рецензии