I do not understand the logic of the end of the world in the Bible. Was it possible to finish everything after the crucifixion. Why come the Antichrist, the second coming of Christ before the end of the world and the very end of the world? I do not see logic. From here I do not believe in biblical tales from some representatives of the Jewish people. This is a fairy tale in the development of events or for them (the plot). One desire of the church is only to complain to the powers that be and even when everyone will serve the Antichrist: both in power and in the church, is this not the way to approve of obscene authority, and believers obedience. In the Bible there is no parable about the righteous ruler (authority). I suggested to the secretary of the diocese, to think together, what parables can be offered to people and authorities about this, but he said that one can only complain, grieve the authorities.
Truly it is from the sheep ("Antichrist") in the holy shepherds of sheep!
End of the world
(My verse)
The light of truth ended,
Opening a new one,
Simple and in some way everything is fine
Shitty ... (the main simple and affordable, and shitty because of "accessibility" and simplicity for tempters religions and dark democracies) (and how to tell everyone?)
When the state power (and the power of thieves) and the church authorities use a parable (secret?) - yes, she is familiar to the boy (do not take the chocolate from someone else's hands): do not be under the authority of someone you do not know, and - who does not Knows). The authorities enjoy an undeserved benefit for the choice of the approximate, the truth is not for everyone. Should be in the Constitution should be reflected principles for a man of dark, dark-democratic.
But the priests consider it inadmissible and sinful to supplement the Bible ... but I do not want this, but civil-church consent in the development, acceptance and offer to people and power of what is not in the Bible, as a civil and offer, an act of consent.
Another principle for the Constitution - parable 2: any division, contrary to God, a sign of power alien to people (from her, power, divide and conquer). All determined, which is disgusting? God (?), And on signs from God.
The Church insists that the knowledge of good and evil is the first, most important sin. And the fact that in itself "innocent" division and division into ... (good and less evil) - even more first and more important.
Again, the church deception, distraction from the most important, closer to the "Antichrist".
And division as such has reached a divided mindset. Divided not in the sense of the received, but in the sense of something separate internal (in the brain), and not external, which is in excess. Divided thinking can be seen in a person when he does not give an answer to the words of truth, expressing understanding, consent, but trying to say, to say something, sometimes in defiance, to express his own self. This manifests his deafness to the truth and the main, to the experience of generations. The example of separation ("no supposedly good or bad") is the departure from the world to the monastery of the monk, the departure from the common Soul of the circle of fellowship, which first "exalted" him to ... thoughts of solitude in the monastery, and which Soul), he does not want to be glorified by word, deed, and a joint worldly affair, together life. The Church does not want to exalt the Common Soul of the Worlds of Faces of the original circle of fellowship.
But I would be wrong if I did not say that the monk is leaving the Antichrist in the world, which is encouraged by the church. This confirms that the non-monastic world church (the community of believers in the world) is thoroughly "anti-Christ." Do not raise the weak, who are bored of the world, - ascetics-monks as their banner, the hierarchs of the church, - this is their, and your shame.