After you would read the following text, please read this link:
http://www.proza.ru/2017/05/29/1110
There are the two reference systems: Reality and Nothingness. The source of Nothingness is satan, the source of Existence is the God. The Prince of this fallen world has invented the Burden of Proof:
Any human is wrong (sick, delusional, criminal, etc.) until he is proven right. In this case the Verity is absent, because any scientific proof is already wrong, for it can be disproved in a future time. The Burden of Proof makes the Religion be attacked by trolls. The burden of proof "a human can be treated as he is already wrong, until he would be proven right" is the more cruel "son" of the Presumption of Guilt.
But the God has given us the saving ring: Presumption of Innocence-
Any human is right (not sick, not delusional, not criminal, etc.) until he is proven wrong. "Bear ye one another's burdens, and so fulfil the law of Christ."
Galatians 6:2 KJV.
"Little Big Town - Happy People" https://youtu.be/DDcJiamY9N8
What about the Original Sin? Nobody is wrong, until proven wrong. But the new born baby is proven wrong by the Church (Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them; and whose soever sins ye retain, they are retained. John 20:23 KJV). He needs the Holy Baptism.
The Presumption of Innocence is not the Presumption of Verity. If human uses common sense language, then he does not sin before his God.
On possibility of perfect Knowledge or
is a faith the faithfulness to Knowledge?
This article belongs to Theology, not to the Debates Among Religions, because the Atheism is not a Religion. The Religion is the Church blessed connection to God.
The natural is measured by the Standard Instruments of Metrology. Why? Because they are unchangeable. So, the Instrument can correctly measure the Nature. The supernatural is measured by the God. Why? Because the God is unchangeable. The divine measure of things one gets from the Religion. The "paper" proofs are essentially the finding the relationships between the Standards of Metrology. So, the proofs must correspond to Universe.
God knows, what God exists. Here is the source of any of our knowledge. So? It can not be said that no-one knows whether there is the God or not. God knows. The all-knowing knows, what He exists. There is, therefore, among all knowledge, the such knowledge.
There are proofs of God. For example, "5 ways of Thomas Aquinas". And the Bible PROOF:
"Now when the centurion, and they that were with him, watching Jesus, saw the earthquake, and those things that were done, they feared greatly, saying, Truly this was the Son of God." Matthew 27:54 KJV. Because mine Church is True (proven in https://youtu.be/laHcgdE55Mo ), it has no falsehoods in it. The Bible is in it, so the Bible is True to God. 1) The Jesus Christ is the Miracle Maker. The Jesus Christ is citing the Bible. So, the God's Book is Bible. 2) The Jesus Christ has promised to save the sinners, if they would truly repent and be baptized. The Jesus Christ is the only Being, who has solved the problem of sin (the evil, as the truly unpleasant things in our life). So, the Bible is True.
The famous design-proof:
The Nature is more difficult to understand, than a watch. The latter must be designed, no way around the designer (because the watch is difficult to understand). So, the Nature is designed. Dude, do you argue, what when you would find the watch in the forest the Nature did it? You do argue. If we find the watch in the forest, there is ZERO probability, what the brainless Nature made it. Correct? If the brainless Nature made this watch, then the total Universe must be in total mess to balance the Entropy Law. Mine Religion has the answer: supernatural act of Creation, wonder, because the God is DIVINE one.
The cosmological proof:
Nature is what the Standard Instruments are measuring, and the Instruments is what measures the Nature. Infinities can not be measured, even in Principle. So, the Nature has finite past (and future), so there is the Supernatural component. The Beginning of the Universe is not the Chapter in Physics textbook, it never will be. Because it is not the part of Nature, it is wonder.
The time machine proof:
The time machines are part of General Relativity - extremely well proven Knowledge. According to Steven Hawking's paper "Chronology protection Conjecture" the site of time machine construction will be destroyed prior to the first time travel attempt. But the timing of destruction is not fixed by the theory. Such destruction is not natural: The Chronology Protector decides when the site must be hit on. So, there is invisible God as solution to all time travel paradoxes. If travel past would meant to travel into alternative past, then it is not the real past time travel. It is only travel to parallel universes, which are inhibited with our clones. Human cloning is the criminal sin! Besides, what about the "No-clone theorem" in (Quantum) Science?
The infinite pain proof:
I tried, precious soul. I really tried. Let us consider the Pascal Wager then. If the pain is infinite there, does it make you want to make peace with God? The infinite pain is proven so: 1) if there is no hell, then there is no bottom of hell, 2) So, the hell has no bottom. "The Son of man goeth as it is written of him: but woe unto that man by whom the Son of man is betrayed! it had been good for that man if he had not been born." Matthew 26:24 KJV.
The absolute truth proof:
THE CYCLIC DEFINITION: The God is the Being, whose opinion is the Absolute Truth
and the Absolute Truth is the opinion of the God. PROOF OF MUTUAL EXISTENCE:
The absolute truth does exist (like an unknowledge of a language, like the doubt in Einstein, like the surence in Einstein), and we have Presumption of Innocence “nobody is wrong (sick, delusional, criminal, etc.) until proven wrong” to fight the trolls. Indeed, the Nihilism (the sinful worship of Nothingness) is not Truth, because its denies Truth. All-knowing one knows, what He exists. So, there is such basic knowledge.
On Presumption of Guilt as block to find the Righteousness
I am recognized author of couple papers in Physical Review E. Then I tried another section: Physical Review D. Paper has demonstrated with rigid math, that not only a long rotating cylinder, but a natural object (rotating Black Hole's ergosphere) acts as time machine. The rejection letter contained something like this:
Thank you for considering our journal. Our reviewers have studied the manuscript and found no errors. However, our reviewer has a feeling, what a fatal mistake is there. Therefore, we, as your kind friends, strongly recommend you not to loose further time with us, but publish it elsewhere.
And I hate, when such unfriendly people write the signature: "Sincerely Yours, editor John." The false atheists do suffer from the culture and the centuries of history of the Presumption of Guilt: "the God and Verity is Guilty, until proven innocent." But let us break this block:
The proof of omniscience:
Let us imagine the Being, who knows everything. So, He must know also, what He Himself exists. Therefore, among the treasure of knowledge we have following knowledge: omniscient Being must exist. The question of God's existence can not be answered negatively, therefore the Reason and God can not be separated. There are no presuppositions here. Can you pick some? I can't see any. The Reason comes with God, the false atheism is a wishful thinking. The adjective "false" comes from the fact, what God is proven: the proofs are part of Reason, the Reason comes with God, so the God must be proven. So, the sentence "No God" is false, therefore the atheism is false. False atheist does not know how the life started (from absence of space and time), to call divine miracles by words (like abiogenesis) does not destroy miracles. So, the false atheists' sentence "No God" is baseless (baseless trolling of Religion). Therefore, the atheism can be called "false atheism". The alternative to false atheism is called "Anti-idolatry". The false atheism becomes way too bigger club, than it was before. In Estonia 3/4 are false atheists. In Russia - 1/2. The numbers are about 10 years ago. When a thing becomes way too popular it looses attraction. It becomes messy. "The Gates are narrow", says our Lord. The atheism is disproved already by Jesus Christ in 30 A.D. Then by holy martyrs, then by the Thomas Acquinas. These proofs are not destroyed, but mocked and trolled. So, the atheism goes with adjective "false". You will thank me for expression "false atheism" in Heaven. I am not accepting atheism as part of real, holy world: I call it "false", the false atheism is unholy. The false atheism is the satanic deceptive fight against the God's deeds and God's people.
Please list all details about all my flaws in proofs, otherwise, do not troll my Religion. I have the proofs of God and His Truth. So, by groundlessly calling them nothing, you do worship the Nothingness. So, you are nihilist. Check the definition of Nihilism in Wikipedia. The commonly used term "Presumption of Innocence" used in innocence before the Trump, or the state. But the more sensible use is the Innocence before the God. Therefore, it includes the freedom from an unproven mistake, an unproven delusion or an unproven hallucination.
The Christian has presented the God proofs, then the false atheist has presented the opposer text. Tell, me honestly, dear opposer, if my God is the Judge of our texts, which one of the two texts will be declared by my God the "right before the God"?
There are God proofs, but in debates we call them "arguments". So, we are inviting unbelievers to argue (the word "argue" is like the "argu-ment"). Let the opposer-s call our proofs the "arguments". Do you say in school: "the argument of Pythagorean theorem is following...."?!
The satan through a “godless one” opposes to them:
Only God decides, what this or that proof or even a simple statement "1 + 1 is equal to two" is true or not true. So before you prove God, you need to have God already proven. Without God, no statement is possible. Therefore, the proof of God is a circular argument.
But this sentence "Without God, no statement is possible." is a statement. Therefore, God exists.
Then satan keeps opposition:
The proofs of God are not refuted nowadays, but they are debunked already, only because they can be refuted in the future.
Note, what a debunked or refuted proof of something is the destroyed proof.
Therefore, satan said nonsense: "The proofs of God are not destroyed, but can be destroyed. Therefore they are destroyed!"
The satan -cursed by God- can not repent, so he opposes the Truth through a godless one:
a proof relies on a witnesses' observations and a mental conclusions. But we can have hallucinations or can be mentally unwell.
However, in order to know the Truth, we must agree with
Presumption of Innocence: any person is in right, until a mistake is found.
And the Truth must exist and we know Truth.
Then satan opposes: "Only God knows the Truth."
And this latter statement is the Truth? Then also a human knows the Truth. Do you doubt that God exists? If yes, then you truly doubt it. Therefore, the Truth must exist. No point to ask for Truth the Nature or a sinful people, it's pointless to prove anything to a people. But since there is the Truth, then there is God, who knows Truth in its fullness. Omniscient God. The people are not the Judges of proofs (the God is), the people shall freely join the proofs-full world.
The "god of Spinoza" is the universal interconnection of things. But Who told Spinoza that it exists? Einstein believed in the Spinoza'es idol, it means, he believed in Nature. But Einstein without Jesus can not know, whether there is the Nature or not. There is something, if it comes from the Holy Trinity. Then, as example, the satan does not exist, but there is the PROBLEM of satan with the Solution in hell. The hell is like the Trash Can. "The God is Light and has no Darkness inside of Him" (to my memory, Bible). How would Light have suddenly the satan?! The angel Lucifer has stopped to exist. "In the Day, when you eat from this Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, you will die" (to my memory, Bible). "Adam, where are you?" (to my memory, Bible). Adam was partly de-touched from Reality, from the Existence. The holy angel Lucifer has lost his existence, so the satan is not real. But the problem of satan is real. The satan is emptiness, is nothingness. The satan can talk to you, can kill you. But he does not exist, exists the problem. And the "false atheism" and nihilism are the evil whisperers of nothingness.
Opposer: "So if the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, what is that? A figment of our imagination?"
No, but it is the edge of Reality. The form of the Universe acts on the objects inside it: the Dark Matter effect as mine unpublished (help to publish!) explanation. Use the simple definition: all what exists comes from the Existence (the God). Evil had no origin in God. The false atheism has no origin in God. It is like in the clip: "The NeverEnding Story Gmork Scene"
https://youtu.be/kOPAW7Em8mE
Holy God can not sin, so the sinners are Darwinists. They simply say a wishful things. We, however, have own sources: "Evidence for Earth's Instant Creation - Polonium Halos in Granite and Coal"
http://www.halos.com/
How to prove True Religion?
1) if all religions are false, then there is the True Religion, so in the light of latter, the others are false. Religion is called "false", if God does not love it. God disgusts when there is a fly in the ointment: for "God is light and there is no darkness in Him" (by my memory, the Bible).
2) You can not say anything against the Antiochian Orthodox Church (AOC).
Hence, the AOC is correct. Faithful to God. Since the AOC is the True Religion, its Book, the Bible, is also true.
3) The false atheists can only troll the Truth (if they do not repent or simply won't be silent in public), because no one is wrong until proven wrong. Presumption of Innocence!
4) AOC is the historical continuation of the Bible
The miracles of Jesus Christ and His references to the Bible and the Holy Church prove the Trueness of the AOC. The holiness of AOC is protected by the Lord God, who is eager to save all people.
5) The doubts of false atheists are the rejection of the Truth by the Pagan movement: the false atheists, judged be deeds, are: 1) satanists (members of the false church of satan in USA), 2) pagans (members of the false church of Flying Spaghetti Monster). They say, that they are the fake members: they are fake members in their mind, but physically they are serving the pagan gods: "By your deeds you will be Judged" (to my memory, Bible).
6) The God is omnipotent, so he has built the Home on Earth: "Peter... I will create My Church" (to my memory, Bible). The soul is happy in the arms of Jesus Christ:
"Belinda Carlisle - Heaven Is A Place On Earth" https://youtu.be/P-WP6POdTgY
Love of Truth and the criterion of scientific character.
Here below is the quote from the fundamental research article in
http://www.proza.ru/2017/05/27/1300
The criterion of scientific theory excludes the possibility of True Theory:
"Scientist must be able to refute any theory." The scientist is pooled into the destruction of the foundations and effects. The most convenient "philosophy" hereby is the false atheism. The adjective "false" describes the fact, what the sentence of atheism "No God" is proven wrong.
Proven wrong already by Jesus Christ, but also by the Thomas Aquinas, by many others and by me: term "reality" means "created by True God", the reality is there and touchable, so there is True God. Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. Matthew 22:37.
"To refute" Einstein is very simple: "Now science does not know, but (for the infinity of future research) can be said with certainty: Einstein's error will be detected."
And as He said these things unto them, the scribes and the Pharisees began to urge Him vehemently, and to provoke Him to speak of many things: Laying wait for Him, and seeking to catch something out of His mouth, that they might accuse Him. (Luke 11:53-54).
Scientists have introduced themselves artificial rules of research (But in vain they do worship Me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. Matthew 15:9). They do not lead to the creation of an intelligent life, but to unreasonable destruction. But the God blessed path of Truth makes people happy:
[MEDIA=youtube]DDcJiamY9N8[/MEDIA]
I propose to change the skeptical sign in Popper's criterion following way:
"a scientist must be able to confirm a theory or hypothesis." At the same time, confirmation tests can destroy the theory, but destruction is not the goal of the activity of scientists. The God can only be confirmed by researcher (if the researcher has stopped to exist, then he can not experience the negative result of the test), so the God necessarily exists. Applicable philosophy: Creationism, the Natural Theology. In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. Genesis 1:1.
Welcome to the Kingdom of Heaven!
Pray; when times come hold fasting with blessing from the True Church; accept the Sacraments of the Church; the Church is proven here: